Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Wealthify
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-15 13:11:18
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (73)
Related
- Clay Aiken's son Parker, 15, makes his TV debut, looks like his father's twin
- Why Shannen Doherty Blames Charmed Costar Alyssa Milano for Rift With Holly Marie Combs
- Thousands gather to honor Mexico’s Virgin of Guadalupe on anniversary of 1531 apparition
- Polish far-right lawmaker extinguishes Hanukkah candle in parliament
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Harvard faculty and alumni show support for president Claudine Gay after her House testimony on antisemitism
- At least $2.1 billion in new funds pledged at COP28, as foundations focus on health and agriculture
- After UPenn president's resignation, Wesleyan University president says leaders should speak out against hate
- Charges: D'Vontaye Mitchell died after being held down for about 9 minutes
- After Texas Supreme Court blocks her abortion, Kate Cox leaves state for procedure
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- The Dutch counterterror agency has raised the national threat alert to the second-highest level
- Scientists say AI is emerging as potential tool for athletes using banned drugs
- Online sports betting to start in Vermont in January
- Sonya Massey's family keeps eyes on 'full justice' one month after shooting
- Bernie Madoff victims to get additional $158 million in restitution
- Sia got liposuction. Who cares? Actually, a lot of people. Here's why.
- Australians prepare for their first cyclone of the season
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Wrongfully convicted Minnesota man set free after nearly 2 decades in prison
Fed rate hikes are over, economists say. Here's what experts say you should do with your money.
Passengers lodge in military barracks after Amsterdam to Detroit flight is forced to land in Canada
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Arctic report card points to rapid and dramatic impacts of climate change
Advice from a critic: Read 'Erasure' before seeing 'American Fiction'
Japan court convicts 3 ex-servicemen in sexual assault case brought by former junior soldier